Hard to reply without knowing the brand and model of the binding, older bindings could mean removing, plugging old holes and re drilling the skis to refit the bindings, or it could mean a simple adjustment and no drilling if a rail system is involved.
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Thread: Re-mounting Bindings
-
30-04-2008, 09:20 AM #1Intermediate Snowatcher
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Sydney, NSW
- Posts
- 171
Thinking about replacing my skis this year, but in the interim, saw a pair of used skis that I might grab to play on. Problem is I have really small feet so it would most probably invlove re-mounting the binding. Any thoughts on how much this compomises the integrity of the ski? Is it significant, or negligible?
[img]graemlins/ismellsnow.gif[/img]\"Karl is a pile of protoplasm that mimics the function of a human being\" - Ricky Gervais
-
30-04-2008, 10:34 AM #2Ski Shop Owner & Equipment Specialist
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Wodonga
- Posts
- 12,718
- Blog Entries
- 3
-
30-04-2008, 11:02 AM #3SilenceGuest
Even if you need to redrill into the ski, it won't really compromise the structural integrity of the ski..You can generally drill a ski up to 3 times before the ski will lose its integrity. The effect on the skis is also minimised the further away from the old holes the new ones are - so if you have really small feet, the holes will probably be a good distance from the current ones - no problem. Obviously there is the added cost of remounting/drilling, rather than just an adjustment, but may be something unavoidable. As paul said, it depends on the Ski/Binding combo
-
30-04-2008, 11:09 AM #4Intermediate Snowatcher
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Sydney, NSW
- Posts
- 171
Thanks guys. It's the Atomic M11 with Atomic Neox 412 or SX 310. I was interested to see what they were like.
\"Karl is a pile of protoplasm that mimics the function of a human being\" - Ricky Gervais
-
30-04-2008, 11:21 AM #5
the neox 412 are on a rail iirc... so they shouldn't be too big a problem... don't know bout the sx310
Not all chemicals are bad. Without chemicals such as hydrogen and oxygen, for example, there would be no way to make water, a vital ingredient in beer!
-
30-04-2008, 11:38 AM #6SilenceGuest
Yeah thats an integrated system on those skis, shouldn't be an issue.
-
30-04-2008, 12:08 PM #7Intermediate Snowatcher
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Sydney, NSW
- Posts
- 171
i thought that might be the case. i guess i'll just have to see now if i can shift them enough to fit my midget foot
\"Karl is a pile of protoplasm that mimics the function of a human being\" - Ricky Gervais
-
30-04-2008, 12:11 PM #8
probly best to pop in to your nearest shop and get them to set the bindings to your boot anyway... shouldn't cost too much and they will set the dins as well...
Not all chemicals are bad. Without chemicals such as hydrogen and oxygen, for example, there would be no way to make water, a vital ingredient in beer!
-
30-04-2008, 12:45 PM #9Intermediate Snowatcher
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Sydney, NSW
- Posts
- 171
Yeah - wasn't planning on doing it myself!
\"Karl is a pile of protoplasm that mimics the function of a human being\" - Ricky Gervais
-
30-04-2008, 02:20 PM #10Ski Shop Owner & Equipment Specialist
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Wodonga
- Posts
- 12,718
- Blog Entries
- 3
Those bindings will easily adjust in about a minute to all adult sizes, however if you are below a size 23.0 boot you may be out of luck altogether, to adjust them you just need to loosen the one centre screw, and not remove the bindings from the skis. this is best done by a shop as both DIN and forward pressure are important for your own safety.Originally posted by ernie_luvs_2_ski:
Thanks guys. It's the Atomic M11 with Atomic Neox 412 or SX 310. I was interested to see what they were like.


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks