The RC4 Sc is my pick as an all rounder for Australia, although I know the Nordica Spitfire and Head supershape will give them a run, as will the Atomic Drive 11, even the slightly higher performance Fischer Progressor will takes sales from them, but for me the RC4 SC is the one to get.
Results 1 to 10 of 17
Thread: Fischer RC4 SC
-
31-03-2008, 12:17 PM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 3
Hi All
I'm an advanced skier looking for a new set of skis. I weigh 92 kg and am 1.85cm tall. I ski approximately 2 to 3 weeks a season in Australia and overseas every second year.Technique is strong as I usually have lessons but at 46 years of age I'm starting to slow down.
I'm looking for a new set of all mountain skis and a pair of RC4 170 cm is available for $700 and I'm keen to get them as my current skis, Dynastar Skicross 66 at 178cm are abit long and getting old and I know Paul likes the Fischers as well.I skied overseas in 2007 on a pair of Nordica Speedmachine 14.2 170cm and really liked them.
My thinking is that I like skis with around 70 cm underfoot due to there ability to change edges more quickly than something that is wider.I have skied on wider skis and haven't really liked them.In Australia we hardly ever see powder and the wide tail and tip of the modern designs provide enough float in most conditions including crud.
With overseas conditions being different and airlines clamping down on excess baggage I would hire when skiing overseas in future and just take my boots.
I think the pair that are available are the 2007 model.
Do you think the Fischer would suit me?
Is there much difference between the recent year models?
Which year is best if there is any difference?
What other skis should I look at?
Any thoughts?
Herby
-
31-03-2008, 02:28 PM #2Ski Shop Owner & Equipment Specialist
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Wodonga
- Posts
- 12,718
- Blog Entries
- 3
-
31-03-2008, 04:32 PM #3SAGuest
Paul - is the Progressor different to the RC4 SC in longitudinal stiffness?
-
31-03-2008, 04:55 PM #4Ski Shop Owner & Equipment Specialist
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Wodonga
- Posts
- 12,718
- Blog Entries
- 3
The Progressor will be stiffer just a little from what I could judge from skiing it, I have no written information on that, they are also wider under foot at 70mm compared to 65mm for the SC, the Progressor has the Flowflex plate as well as sidewall construction, I think the Progressor is more suited to racing than an all round ski, although the few runs I had on them on icy snow made me think a good skier could use them in most conditions.
-
31-03-2008, 07:15 PM #5SAGuest
Hmmm...could be too stiff for a lightweight like me.
-
31-03-2008, 11:02 PM #6Snowatch Patroller
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- planet earth
- Posts
- 6,628
If you look at it that way SA you better head to the kids sectionOriginally posted by SA:
Hmmm...could be too stiff for a lightweight like me.
[img]tongue.gif[/img]
Whatever!
-
31-03-2008, 11:31 PM #7
they do come in kids size
Not all chemicals are bad. Without chemicals such as hydrogen and oxygen, for example, there would be no way to make water, a vital ingredient in beer!
-
01-04-2008, 04:59 AM #8
Lil Vet upgraded her rossis with a 2nd hand 150cm set with bindings from Georges last year for $200, and loved them. Luckily George abided by the price given by his staff member, hehe.
The Frog is a Prince
-
01-04-2008, 09:11 AM #9Ski Shop Owner & Equipment Specialist
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Wodonga
- Posts
- 12,718
- Blog Entries
- 3
One of the nicest guys in the snow business, George runs a great shop and really cares about his customers. It will be a sad day when he and Hans Grimus decide to retire one day.Originally posted by Vet:
Lil Vet upgraded her rossis with a 2nd hand 150cm set with bindings from Georges last year for $200, and loved them. Luckily George abided by the price given by his staff member, hehe.
-
01-04-2008, 09:26 AM #10
Our family has hired skis from him since they hired my first set of plastic skis back in the day...
Not all chemicals are bad. Without chemicals such as hydrogen and oxygen, for example, there would be no way to make water, a vital ingredient in beer!


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks