Brett stewart formally charged [Archive]

Jahoota

10-03-2009, 08:36 PM

Regardless whether they play sport or not I just don't understand blokes who get on the turps and then turn into a.holes, particually when women are involved.

They're quick to blame booze but how come lots of blokes can have a skinful and not behave in such a manner to women? It must be an attitude thing. Its pathetic really, whether its a well known sports "star" or just your average punter.

The Frog

10-03-2009, 08:43 PM

Agreed Spicey.

No details have been published as yet and probably won't for some time, it's all heresay and innuendo at the moment. Lets let the legal system do it's job. Too many conflicting stories to come to any kind of conclusion on this.

10-03-2009, 09:19 PM

something not quite right about this case

ssar

10-03-2009, 10:00 PM

Originally posted by TC:
something not quite right about this case Yea, I have a feeling there is more to this than will ever be made public or discovered to be the full truth of that night.

However, Stewart has clearly done enough wrong to warrant some legal court appearance, and seems to have gone at least a bit stupid after a couple too many beers.

He should be treated just like any other elite football player / top sportsman, no special treatment etc.

As long as the investigations etc. are all done fairly and honestly.

I am as shocked as anyone - I have been loving his brilliant onfield play over the past few years, such a shame he has slipped up this time.

Go Sea Eagles through all the good times and bad, regardless!

The Frog

10-03-2009, 10:46 PM

Brings new meaning to the term 'grapple tackle'

....sorry couldn't help it and probably in bad taste. graemlins/we_need_snow_emoticon.gif graemlins/cold.gif graemlins/outtahere.gif

Polaris

10-03-2009, 11:57 PM

what about the sponsor on radio today that bagged Whatmough's version of the "slap"

The Frog

11-03-2009, 12:02 AM

Don't know about it being Watmough's version, he hasn't been quoted saying anything.

D-Dog

11-03-2009, 08:26 AM

watmough is a great player but he is a dumb thug, stewart is a smart guy and i wonder if he really cant remember what he did, if so it will be interesting to see how his lawyer defends him.

11-03-2009, 08:44 AM

there are two sides

Witnesses have now come forward to claim Watmough was not to blame for the ugly scenes involving Mr Durazza - who is, ironically, Stewart's personal sponsor.

Gallery: Sarah Durazza and the confrontation

It is understood Watmough told Mr Durazza he should be "embarrassed" for allowing his daughter to attend a rugby league function wearing a short white skirt.

Another witness said Mr Durazza was ejected from the bar after initially confronting Watmough over his comments, before re-entering the premises and charging at the player. Bar staff and players were needed to restrain Mr Durazza before he was asked to leave for a second time.

"What should I do? I was defending myself," Watmough said. "He was charging me. I just pushed him away. It was not a punch. There are 100 people who will sign sworn statements to back me up."

11-03-2009, 08:48 AM

http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,6524004,00.jpg
the lady in question

Caboose

11-03-2009, 12:34 PM

NRL - David Gallop (sp) has suspended Bret until round 5

manly has copped a $100K fine

Tobi

11-03-2009, 12:39 PM

Originally posted by Caboose:
NRL - David Gallop (sp) has suspended Bret until round 5

manly has copped a $100K fine Wow that's a bit harsh for the team to cop a fine that large but I guess they should put their players under the thumb more.

BrumbyJack

11-03-2009, 12:49 PM

Would the fine for the club be for selecting him to play contrary to advice not to???

Caboose

11-03-2009, 01:00 PM

all of that is a result of contrary conduct against NRL policy

nothing to do with the sexual assult charges

i reckon you are correct BJ

Bear

11-03-2009, 01:02 PM

Watmough is still an idiot for complaining that she was in too short a skirt. ;)
http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,6524004,00.jpg

Swede

11-03-2009, 01:04 PM

Not wrong Bear, the one in that photo is a bit looong ;)

Caboose

11-03-2009, 01:07 PM

all of the above is going to work in favour of her getting publicity & modeling contracts ;)

BrumbyJack

11-03-2009, 01:08 PM

Remind me to lock Snow Princess up and throw away the key!!!

Obviously women need to wear neck to ankle clothing to be safe??? Or am I totally misreading some of the insinuations on this page?

Swede

11-03-2009, 01:10 PM

Originally posted by BrumbyJack:

Obviously women need to wear neck to ankle clothing to be safe??? Or am I totally misreading some of the insinuations on this page? Misread BJ

BrumbyJack

11-03-2009, 01:12 PM

That is good... but what relevance does what the victim look like have on the case at all???

The Frog

11-03-2009, 01:12 PM

So he's suspended til his court date? So guilty til proven innocent then I suppose. How come two players last year got to play when they up for the same charge? or was it a grapple?

I think their are grounds to appeal this as the precedent was set last year.

The Frog

11-03-2009, 01:14 PM

Anger as Brett Stewart stood down by NRL

AAPMarch 11, 2009 01:08pm

THE Rugby League Players' Association has condemned the NRL's move to stand down Manly star Brett Stewart from playing football until round five.
Stewart has been charged with the sexual assault of a 17-year-old girl at North Manly following a boozy club season launch.

The NRL today said it had banned Stewart from playing rugby league until round five - after his assault charge is heard in court on April 7.

The RLPA supports Stewart's right to continue playing football while the matter goes through the courts.

"The Rugby League Players' Association's position has always been to support the rights of its members and as a general rule, a player should not be stood down from playing and fulfilling his contractual commitments to his club because he has been charged with a criminal offence particularly where the player has indicated that he will defend the charge," said RLPA managing director Matt Rodwell.

"A player like any other person in the community is entitled to the presumption of innocence - the basis of the judicial system in Australia."

Caboose

11-03-2009, 01:16 PM

depends BJ

i don't think we are insinuating greatly, just having fun, tells us if we have gone too far :D

but
if women/ladies/girls dress "sexy" or "sexily"

then they are going to get comments/compliments, i believe that is a fact and part of life

there is definitely an over sexualization of younger women these days, we have good ol Paris and co to thank for that

Caboose

11-03-2009, 01:18 PM

Originally posted by BrumbyJack:
That is good... but what relevance does what the victim look like have on the case at all??? that isn't the sexual assult victim BJ

BrumbyJack

11-03-2009, 01:23 PM

Comments and compliments are one thing, but justifying sexual assault because of it are another.

I was just wondering what relevance the Pic that TC posted really has to do with this issue???

That looks like a professional shot to me, so of course it is going to be provocative.

BrumbyJack

11-03-2009, 01:24 PM

ohhhhhhh, OK, thanks for clearing that up for me Caboose!!! I thought TC had posted a pic of the victim.

Caboose

11-03-2009, 01:26 PM

there are 2 events

i with Bret + sexual assult

1 with watmough making comments about that girl in the pic who isthe daughter of a sponsor of the Manly club

BrumbyJack

11-03-2009, 01:28 PM

Ahhh... perhaps soon to be daughter of EX sponsor of the club!!!

I thought the girl in both cases was the same girl.

The Frog

11-03-2009, 03:01 PM

No the girl in question with Stewart is not good looking at all. And people should also remember that sexual assault doesn't mean rape (although in some cases it does).

Paul Oberin

11-03-2009, 03:25 PM

Originally posted by Tobi:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Caboose:
NRL - David Gallop (sp) has suspended Bret until round 5

manly has copped a $100K fine Wow that's a bit harsh for the team to cop a fine that large but I guess they should put their players under the thumb more. [/QUOTE]It said on our local news that the $100k fine was for the club throwing the boozy party.

The Frog

11-03-2009, 03:26 PM

That was an excuse, they say that's the reason Stewart was suspended also.

Polaris

11-03-2009, 04:23 PM

bringing the game into disrepute
Stewart was suspended on that aspect as well as the 100k fine for the club.

No basis on the actual charge laid on Stewart.

mr magoo

11-03-2009, 04:34 PM

Who would want to be a NRL,AFL player these days
as your under scrutiny 24hrs a day.Just be a church goer,don't have a drink,don't go to parties etc etc and you'll be right.

Polaris

11-03-2009, 04:44 PM

Originally posted by mr magoo:
Just be a church goer,don't have a drink,don't go to parties etc etc and you'll be right. Wow that sounds like a perfect description of my lifestyle ;)

SnowSnow

11-03-2009, 06:23 PM

I think stewart should cop the fine, Or at least a larger portion of it. These players are no good for the game. I don't think an alchol ban would work though as it would be to hard to police and it's unfair for the few blokes who know how to handle themselves.

[ 11.03.2009, 06:23 PM: Message edited by: SnowSnow ]

Jahoota

11-03-2009, 07:35 PM

ahhhhh... rugby league. Always more drama than a bunch of drag queens before mardi gras kick off.

Bendalong

11-03-2009, 09:15 PM

Apparently Stewart did it because he was missing "the beaver"! and Manly have requested the NRL theme song to be changed to "thats my teen". ....sorry couldn't help it and probably in bad taste.

The Frog

11-03-2009, 09:48 PM

I heard both those this morning. smile.gif

Did anything happen to Darren Lockyer last season when he was refused drinks and told to leave a Brisbane pub and then tackled (albeit softly) the manager outside? Smacks of double standards.

Bendalong

11-03-2009, 10:01 PM

Many standards and much spin. In a nutshell all facets of football and even Olympic swimming have major issues with alcohol related incidents be it sexual, violence or neanderthal such as Todd Carney's serial behaviour.

Tobi

11-03-2009, 10:08 PM

Originally posted by Paul Oberin:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Tobi:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Caboose:
NRL - David Gallop (sp) has suspended Bret until round 5

manly has copped a $100K fine Wow that's a bit harsh for the team to cop a fine that large but I guess they should put their players under the thumb more. [/QUOTE]It said on our local news that the $100k fine was for the club throwing the boozy party. [/QUOTE]Any sporting club shouldn't be encouraging their players to drink during season or pre-season.

The Frog

11-03-2009, 10:27 PM

Yeah Tobi but the clubs owner threw his card on the bar for the players once the official things had finished. Hardly responsible but it happens in heaps of workplaces.

[ 11.03.2009, 10:28 PM: Message edited by: The Frog ]

Tobi

11-03-2009, 11:00 PM

Originally posted by The Frog:
Yeah Tobi but the clubs owner threw his card on the bar for the players once the official things had finished. Hardly responsible but it happens in heaps of workplaces. Yeah but the difference here is that 'heaps of work places' aren't under the key of the media or the public.

These players are people that the public look up to and they need to understand that their actions have an impact on the grater community. They shouldn't be acting in ways that will be a determent to their image.

As much as they may not like being in the public eye it's something that comes with the job.

Glad to see on the late news that some clubs are making changes to their club functions and player drinking.

Caboose

12-03-2009, 09:37 AM

The Frog

12-03-2009, 10:02 AM

Originally posted by Tobi:
Glad to see on the late news that some clubs are making changes to their club functions and player drinking. They will have to now a precedent has been set. Any player that is drunk or refused service/asked to leave anywhere in a public place can/should now be suspended.

Donza

12-03-2009, 10:06 AM

Originally posted by The Frog:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Tobi:
Glad to see on the late news that some clubs are making changes to their club functions and player drinking. They will have to now a precedent has been set. Any player that is drunk or refused service/asked to leave anywhere in a public place can/should now be suspended. [/QUOTE]Well that depends how he has conducted himself while drunk. Thats the issue here.

Swede

12-03-2009, 10:15 AM

I know these guys are in the public eye and people look up to them and all that, but plenty people look up to all the musicians around the world as well. Imagine if we would judge those guys the same way, Keith Richards career would have ended in the early 60s. Thank good we don’t judge them the same way or the music scène would be pretty lame.
They can’t break the law, but surely they can be human and make a mistake.

Donza

12-03-2009, 10:26 AM

Originally posted by Swede:
I know these guys are in the public eye and people look up to them and all that, but plenty people look up to all the musicians around the world as well. Imagine if we would judge those guys the same way, Keith Richards career would have ended in the early 60s. Thank good we don’t judge them the same way or the music scène would be pretty lame.
They can’t break the law, but surely they can be human and make a mistake. Yeah swede thats true...but imagine if they did it to our daughters.

Swede

12-03-2009, 10:37 AM

Originally posted by Donza:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Swede:
I know these guys are in the public eye and people look up to them and all that, but plenty people look up to all the musicians around the world as well. Imagine if we would judge those guys the same way, Keith Richards career would have ended in the early 60s. Thank good we don’t judge them the same way or the music scène would be pretty lame.
They can’t break the law, but surely they can be human and make a mistake. Yeah swede thats true...but imagine if they did it to our daughters. [/QUOTE]Totally agree Donza, if they do something bad then suspend them, no problem.

Caboose

12-03-2009, 10:41 AM

Originally posted by Swede:
Thank good we don’t judge them the same way or the music scène would be pretty lame.
longbow to draw there swede ....

Bear

12-03-2009, 11:06 AM

Your a musician aren't you cabby?

Swede has just given you a license to get hammered and act like a burke. graemlins/woohoo.gif

The Frog

12-03-2009, 11:16 AM

Originally posted by Donza:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by The Frog:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Tobi:
Glad to see on the late news that some clubs are making changes to their club functions and player drinking. They will have to now a precedent has been set. Any player that is drunk or refused service/asked to leave anywhere in a public place can/should now be suspended. [/QUOTE]Well that depends how he has conducted himself while drunk. Thats the issue here. [/QUOTE]Nothing has been reported about any bad behaviour at the Hotel by Stewart and apparently the suspension has nothing to do with the charge that has been laid (that he will defend). So it must be because he had too many drinks.

Donza

12-03-2009, 11:37 AM

Originally posted by The Frog:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Donza:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by The Frog:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Tobi:
Glad to see on the late news that some clubs are making changes to their club functions and player drinking. They will have to now a precedent has been set. Any player that is drunk or refused service/asked to leave anywhere in a public place can/should now be suspended. [/QUOTE]Well that depends how he has conducted himself while drunk. Thats the issue here. [/QUOTE]Nothing has been reported about any bad behaviour at the Hotel by Stewart and apparently the suspension has nothing to do with the charge that has been laid (that he will defend). So it must be because he had too many drinks. [/QUOTE]The suspension is for bringing the game into "disrepute". In other words getting drunk and getting yourselves charged by the police.

SnowSnow

12-03-2009, 11:38 AM

I still think he's been suspended because of the charge. Gallop is just using the "other" events to suspend him. It should be an atoumatic suspension if they are charged by police. Not a bad sugestion at all.

SnowSnow

12-03-2009, 11:42 AM

Originally posted by The Frog:
I heard both those this morning. smile.gif

Did anything happen to Darren Lockyer last season when he was refused drinks and told to leave a Brisbane pub and then tackled (albeit softly) the manager outside? Smacks of double standards. I hear you totally frog!Gallop and the Nrl have always stood by the QLd clubs.
Also I think Greg bird should felt a little hard done by here. Cos he was stood down by the sharks before he was even charged by police. Yet the only reason stewart is not playing is because the suspensions was forced apon the club. Double standards everywhere Frog.

The Frog

12-03-2009, 01:59 PM

Greg Bird was different, he lied to police and his club, he tried to blame his housemate who wasn't even there at the time.

Swede

12-03-2009, 02:05 PM

Originally posted by The Frog:
Greg Bird was different, he lied to police and his club, he tried to blame his housemate who wasn't even there at the time. Now that's the sort of people we should rub out of the game (and society for that matter). Not someone that has 1 or 10 too many drinks once in their life and make a goose of themselves, that’s just called growing up and learning from your mistakes.

SnowSnow

12-03-2009, 03:38 PM

Originally posted by The Frog:
Greg Bird was different, he lied to police and his club, he tried to blame his housemate who wasn't even there at the time. I mean the way the Nrl and club went about it not his actions.

Caboose

12-03-2009, 03:58 PM

just heard something to the fact of the DNA test was negative for Bret for sexual assault

Caboose

12-03-2009, 04:02 PM

live news

DNA tests conducted by police on Manly fullback Brett Stewart have not come up with any results to support the sexual assault charges against him, according to the Daily Telegraph.

Police took DNA samples from both Stewart and the alleged 17-year-old victim after sexual assault claims were made aginast the fullback last Friday night.

The tests were returned to police this afternoon, with the results from both turning up no supportiong evidence.

The sexual assault charges against the 24-year-old still stand despite the new developments.

The Frog

12-03-2009, 04:24 PM

So it wasn't a grade 2 grapple, can he get the charge downgrade to careless?

12-03-2009, 08:56 PM

told ya that theres something sus about this charge
No DNA on either of them

The Frog

12-03-2009, 09:05 PM

maybe Aliens did it.

12-03-2009, 09:08 PM

only in her mind

Swede

12-03-2009, 09:19 PM

Maybe he was just a ****ed idiot and someone is trying to Ca$$$$$$$h in on it??

Swede

12-03-2009, 09:20 PM

Wouldn't be the first

The Frog

12-03-2009, 09:50 PM

You mean someone like the girls dad who did three years in jail for fraud (over $350,000) and using multiple false identities?

Polaris

12-03-2009, 10:23 PM

Originally posted by The Frog:
You mean someone like the girls dad who did three years in jail for fraud (over $350,000) and using multiple false identities? Now that is a very long bow to draw there Mr Frog :eek:
Absolutely no relevance whatsoever.

I know you are a dyed in the wool Manly supporter but do you really think Brett Stewart has been unfairly treated in the situation?
He has a contract with the NRL (in coordination with his club) with specific clauses regarding bringing the game in to disrepute etc etc
Has he broken that contract?
I put to you he has. Not by the allegation but by being as ****ed as 10 men in public before the alleged incident.
Has Whatmough broken that contract?
I put to you he has. For exactly the same reason as above.
Did Greg Bird break a similiar contract?
Yes he did.

Bird was shafted from the game before he was even charged and on that basis alone you cannot say Stewart has been harshly treated. I am not a legal mind but I reckon sexual assault might be a bit higher up the scale as opposed to aggravated assault (purely guessing here)

Are there other examples which seem to point towards double standards?
Absolutely!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just look at Whatmough for starters!

But as "the face" of Rugby League in season 2009, Stewart has to cop it on the chin at this stage to make the bosses of the game "look" as though they are doing the right thing

My 2c worth

GO THE SWANNIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Swede

12-03-2009, 10:47 PM

Originally posted by Polaris:
[QUOTE]But as "the face" of Rugby League in season 2009, Stewart has to cop it on the chin at this stage to make the bosses of the game "look" as though they are doing the right thing
I think that's unfortunately the only reason he’s gonna miss the first 5 rounds.
And for the record, how do I say it in a family friendly way, do not like Manly very much, so I’m not at all biased.

The Frog

12-03-2009, 10:52 PM

Yes I am a Manly supporter.

Do I think Stewart has been treated harshly? in regards to the suspensison yes.

As far the the drinking goes, Stewart was refused service and told to leave so he got a cab home just before 8pm....happens every night hundreds of people in Manly on a weekend. Apparently the NRL tells us this is why he was suspended. Watmough was drinking and had an altercation and the NRL did nothing (I hear the Manly club will now take action against him and not reveal the details).

Matthew Johns put it to David Gallop tonight that is was a double standard and other players have done similar in the past without penalty including Darren Lockyer. Gallop pretty much said it was cause he was the face of the NRL (a tag Stewart didn't ask for). It shouldn't matter how much money you are on or if you are on an advertisement...they sign the same contracts and should all be treated equally.

As for the Greg Bird incident. His contract was terminated once it was found out he lied to the club and Police and tried to cover it up by blaming an innocent person. Remember his girlfriend didn't deny he did it, she just wanted the charges dropped which the Police wouldn't do.

As for the girls father, yes it is drawing a long bow. There are too many conflicting stories to know what happened ir anything.

Polaris

12-03-2009, 10:55 PM

OK we will agree to disagree re the suspension :cheers:

The Frog

12-03-2009, 10:55 PM

Originally posted by Swede:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Polaris:

But as "the face" of Rugby League in season 2009, Stewart has to cop it on the chin at this stage to make the bosses of the game "look" as though they are doing the right thing
I think that's unfortunately the only reason he’s gonna miss the first 5 rounds.
And for the record, how do I say it in a family friendly way, do not like Manly very much, so I’m not at all biased. That's the bit that annoys me. He's inly suspended cause the NRL/gallop are embarrassed/annoyed that he was the face of their ad campaign. It's unfortunate yes but he should be treated as same as any player that signs to their terms.

Polaris

12-03-2009, 10:59 PM

Can we agree that as "professional" footballers, both Stewart, Whatmough, Bird, Lockyear, Johns.... where do you stop ;) ........... all broke their contracts?

12-03-2009, 11:00 PM

the police shouild just drop the charges

Polaris

12-03-2009, 11:07 PM

Having been around a few footy clubs in my years, I have seen many a young kid, with more talent and natural ability than you could poke a stick at, lose the plot once they discovered "things" ;) outside school and school boy stuff.
Been happening for years and still will for years to come.
The really, really talented ones get cocooned within the club protectionist mentality of "silly young boy" etc etc but then they get the "I am invincible" head on and think they can behave like that in the real world when we all know now in a world of 24/7 scrutiny they cannot!!

The Frog

12-03-2009, 11:07 PM

Originally posted by Polaris:
Can we agree that as "professional" footballers, both Stewart, Whatmough, Bird, Lockyear, Johns.... where do you stop ;) ........... all broke their contracts? Yes for sure. More so Watmough and the others.

Polaris

12-03-2009, 11:08 PM

Originally posted by TC:
the police shouild just drop the charges Why?

The Frog

12-03-2009, 11:08 PM

Originally posted by TC:
the police shouild just drop the charges We don't know details though TC, I'm sure they are just doing their job. They would have only for the DNA results this arvo, they may then have to re-interview etc.

Polaris

12-03-2009, 11:15 PM

They would not have laid the charges in the 1st place if they didn't have more evidence than just a hunch reliant on a yet to be sampled DNA sample :confused:

In saying that, let the system run its course and I hope that it finds the correct outcome so in saying that, lets not forget Stewart was suspended for "bringing the game into disrepute" not "sexual assault"

The Frog

12-03-2009, 11:54 PM

I don't think he brought the game into disrepute at the hotel or even in getting a cab home, it was the alleged incident afterwards that got the exposure.

Spiceman

13-03-2009, 12:35 AM

What happens if police drop charges this week?? Does he stay suspended? I reckon Frog is on to something with the old man. Apparently their is a video showing an altercation between stewart and the old bloke... very interesting...

As for NRL, it's hard for them because they are trying to battle very negative press and be seen to be doing something so probably the right move by them....

The Frog

13-03-2009, 12:45 AM

The suspension will stick Spicey as they have already said it was cause he was drunk and refused service and asked to leave the hotel.

All will be forgotten when he is leading try scorer at the end of the season after missing the first four games. smile.gif

skijacski

13-03-2009, 06:48 AM

Who's Brett stewart?

SnowSnow

13-03-2009, 07:18 AM

graemlins/big_laugh.gif

The Frog

13-03-2009, 03:23 PM

Originally posted by skijacski:
Who's Brett stewart? Glenns brother.

skichic

13-03-2009, 03:31 PM

who's Glenn Stewart???

The Frog

13-03-2009, 03:43 PM

Bretts brother.

skichic

13-03-2009, 03:44 PM

ahhh!

what's his mum's name? graemlins/cold.gif

Bear

13-03-2009, 03:50 PM

Stewart? :confused:

The Frog

13-03-2009, 04:04 PM

Originally posted by SC:
ahhh!

what's his mum's name? graemlins/cold.gif Mrs Stewart.

Donza

13-03-2009, 04:13 PM

Remember Frog he is from Berkeley.

The Frog

13-03-2009, 05:12 PM

Funny how the northern beaches of the gong operates like the northern beaches of sydney....anything south or west is not desirable. smile.gif

BrumbyJack

13-03-2009, 05:57 PM

Originally posted by Polaris:
Having been around a few footy clubs in my years, I have seen many a young kid, with more talent and natural ability than you could poke a stick at, lose the plot once they discovered "things" ;) outside school and school boy stuff.
Been happening for years and still will for years to come.
The really, really talented ones get cocooned within the club protectionist mentality of "silly young boy" etc etc but then they get the "I am invincible" head on and think they can behave like that in the real world when we all know now in a world of 24/7 scrutiny they cannot!! Words of experience there ;)

And I agree 100%.

SnowSnow

13-03-2009, 07:35 PM

I thought Gallop said they'd canned the add. Just saw it on 9 before kick off.

Donza

13-03-2009, 08:05 PM

Originally posted by The Frog:
Funny how the northern beaches of the gong operates like the northern beaches of sydney....anything south or west is not desirable. smile.gif Hahaha. Its true.

Youre in a good spot frog.

The Frog

13-03-2009, 09:18 PM

I used to live in gods country, then moved to his holiday location.

Donza

13-03-2009, 09:21 PM

Originally posted by The Frog:
I used to live in gods country, then moved to his holiday location. Cmon the dragons........

Caboose

14-03-2009, 10:50 AM

whoops donza ;)

Swede

14-03-2009, 05:32 PM

Originally posted by Donza:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by The Frog:
I used to live in gods country, then moved to his holiday location. Cmon the dragons........ [/QUOTE]I know we lost mate, but I have to say it's looking good for the season ahead.